Floating Button
Home News Management & Corporate Governance

Resource for recourse: How should MAS enhance avenues for investor recourse?

Jovi Ho
Jovi Ho • 10 min read
Resource for recourse: How should MAS enhance avenues for investor recourse?
MAS must clearly define upcoming investor recourse measures or risk listcos being “held hostage”, say lawyers. Should management be concerned, and what can Singapore learn from other jurisdictions? Photo: Shutterstock
Font Resizer
Share to Whatsapp
Share to Facebook
Share to LinkedIn
Scroll to top
Follow us on Facebook and join our Telegram channel for the latest updates.

Clearly define investor recourse measures or risk listcos being “held hostage”, say lawyers about MAS’s upcoming schemes

News broke over the weekend that Drew & Napier, one of Singapore’s largest law firms, is set to sue Switzerland before the year ends. They seek some US$300 million ($389.8 million) in compensation for around 560 Credit Suisse bondholders across Asia who were burnt by the Swiss government’s 2023 decision to write down 16.5 billion Swiss francs in additional tier 1 (AT1) debt.

According to a Bloomberg report, Drew & Napier plans to sue on behalf of Japanese bondholders first, followed by investors in Hong Kong and Singapore. In February, Drew & Napier said around 300 Singaporean AT1 investors were among those claiming losses.

×
The Edge Singapore
Download The Edge Singapore App
Google playApple store play
Keep updated
Follow our social media
© 2026 The Edge Publishing Pte Ltd. All rights reserved.