Floating Button
Home News REIT Watch

Freehold versus leasehold

Goola Warden
Goola Warden • 5 min read
Freehold versus leasehold
S-REITs may need to be a certain size for their portfolios to be sufficiently diversified to withstand the impact of forex, short land tenures and interest rate cycles
Font Resizer
Share to Whatsapp
Share to Facebook
Share to LinkedIn
Scroll to top
Follow us on Facebook and join our Telegram channel for the latest updates.

The way to overcome the freehold-versus-leasehold conundrum is probably through asset size and quality. All the issues with S-REITs, whether it’s internally versus externally managed, issues with leases, forex and freehold versus leasehold, are to have an S-REIT that is large enough with a mix of different assets to withstand divesting some assets, and adding others. CapitaLand Ascendas REIT has $17.7 billion in assets as of Sept 30, with the Singapore core at 67% and the remaining assets spread across Australia, the EU, the UK, and the US. This gives CLAR around 33% of freehold assets.

The average land tenure of its Singapore portfolio is 40 years, so it’s not going to fall over a cliff. As William Tay, CEO of CLAR’s manager, notes, this is longer than JTC land tenures, which range from 20 to 30 years. Recently, the government added three more years for construction. The 40-year weighted average land tenure should give investors comfort, Tay adds.

Properties on shorter lease tenures can be divested to end-users and owner-occupiers. In a recent transaction, a construction company acquired an industrial property in Tuas with 12 years of land tenure. The rationale, says a spokesperson, is that the outlay is lower than the rents over the 12 years.

×
The Edge Singapore
Download The Edge Singapore App
Google playApple store play
Keep updated
Follow our social media
© 2026 The Edge Publishing Pte Ltd. All rights reserved.