Floating Button
Home News REIT Watch

Internal vs external: hot potato or hot AIR?

Goola Warden
Goola Warden • 12 min read
Internal vs external: hot potato or hot AIR?
Although some external managers such as those of the US S-REITs have upset their investors, the performance of Asia's largest externally and internally managed REITs tell a different story
Font Resizer
Share to Whatsapp
Share to Facebook
Share to LinkedIn
Scroll to top
Follow us on Facebook and join our Telegram channel for the latest updates.

The debate over an internally managed REIT model versus an externally managed REIT model may have been put to rest following the performance of CapitaLand Integrated Commercial Trust (CICT) and Link REIT. On the other hand, Singapore now has its first internally managed REIT: Alpha Integrated REIT (AIR). Link REIT is also internally managed, while CICT is part of the larger CapitaLand Group and is externally managed.

These REITs are not directly comparable. For one, CICT is primarily based in Singapore and continues to expand its presence there. Link REIT’s portfolio is mainly in Hong Kong and China, with 12 properties (11.8% of assets) in Singapore, Australia and the UK. Hence, it is a lot more diversified. AIR is a minnow compared with CICT and Link REIT, making it an unusual candidate for internalisation. But here we are.

Size matters because it focuses on economies of scale. This is particularly the case where the property management is centralised. Whether a REIT is internally managed or externally managed, all property portfolios require a property manager. Internally managed Link REIT disburses property management fees, and AIR will also need a property manager. A disadvantage of a small REIT like AIR is its lack of economies of scale, which may affect its net property income (NPI) margin.

×
The Edge Singapore
Download The Edge Singapore App
Google playApple store play
Keep updated
Follow our social media
© 2026 The Edge Publishing Pte Ltd. All rights reserved.