Continue reading this on our app for a better experience

Open in App
Floating Button
Home News Wealth

Credit Suisse fraudster's statements weren't just 'human errors,' adviser testifies

Bloomberg
Bloomberg • 3 min read
Credit Suisse fraudster's statements weren't just 'human errors,' adviser testifies
“Some were human errors but some there’s change in value dates that clearly were not human error,” Bachiashvili said Friday in court. Photo: Bloomberg
Font Resizer
Share to Whatsapp
Share to Facebook
Share to LinkedIn
Scroll to top
Follow us on Facebook and join our Telegram channel for the latest updates.

An adviser to the billionaire suing a Credit Suisse trust for US$800 million ($1.12 billion) in damages told a Singapore court that the disgraced banker who defrauded his boss made mistakes in the portfolio statements that clearly went beyond just “human errors.”

Patrice Lescaudron, the banker whose conviction for fraud triggered lawsuits around the world from clients including Bidzina Ivanishvili, admitted in 2015 that he had faked signatures and trading orders to try and recover losses in his clients’ portfolios. He also confessed to running two sets of client statements at times to hide the hidden trades and differing valuations.

George Bachiashvili, Ivanishvili’s adviser, testified about those discrepancies at the trial, which pits the Georgian against Credit Suisse Trust (Singapore) Ltd., through which Ivanishvili had hundred of millions invested.

“Some were human errors but some there’s change in value dates that clearly were not human error,” Bachiashvili said Friday in court, referring to private-equity positions that were updated with a time lag.

Bachiashvili testified after his boss spent four days on the stand, fending off attempts by CS Trust’s lawyer, Lee Eng Beng, to prove Ivanishvili was no novice but an experienced investor who knew the risks and was more actively involved in the management of his portfolio than he’s let on.

One of the key questions for the Singapore judge to evaluate is whether Credit Suisse or any of its units bear responsibility for Lescaudron’s behaviour. The Zurich-based bank has repeatedly argued the Frenchman was a lone wolf who hid his crimes from his colleagues and supervisors around the world. Ivanishvili has consistently countered that at some level, Credit Suisse either knew or should have known about his near decade-long deception - and should be held responsible.

See also: The latest TikTok trend of 'loud budgeting'

Bachiashvili said he set up a database to track the tycoon’s money but that it was based on data he received from Lescaudron that he didn’t have reason at the time to question the figures. Moreover, Bachiashvili testified, neither he nor Ivanishvili would steer Lescaudron, one way or another, into recommending certain investments during their regular meetings with the Frenchman but left that up to the bank’s advisers.

But Lee pushed the issue of responsibility, pointing out that Bachiashvili was named as an investment manager on one of the trusts handling Ivanishvili’s money. Bachiashvili became an additional investment manager of the Mandalay Trust in December 2013, according to a court filing.

“In investment banks there are many hundreds of vice presidents, different types of managers,” said Bachiashvili. “It doesn’t mean much. It’s just a title.”

Highlights

Re test Testing QA Spotlight
1000th issue

Re test Testing QA Spotlight

Get the latest news updates in your mailbox
Never miss out on important financial news and get daily updates today
×
The Edge Singapore
Download The Edge Singapore App
Google playApple store play
Keep updated
Follow our social media
© 2024 The Edge Publishing Pte Ltd. All rights reserved.