Floating Button
Home Views Shareholder activism

Giving Mark Zuckerberg unquestioned power was asking for trouble

Chris Bryant
Chris Bryant • 4 min read
Giving Mark Zuckerberg unquestioned power was asking for trouble
Photo: Bloomberg
Font Resizer
Share to Whatsapp
Share to Facebook
Share to LinkedIn
Scroll to top
Follow us on Facebook and join our Telegram channel for the latest updates.

Splashing tens of billions of dollars on building the metaverse has gone down like a lead avatar with Meta Platforms Inc. shareholders, with its market capitalization down by about three-quarters from its peak of US$1.1 trillion reached barely a year ago.

Chairman and CEO Mark Zuckerberg has gone rogue, but I find myself unsympathetic to shareholders’ plight. Nobody forced them to purchase Meta stock and founder hubris is a risk you take when granting entrepreneurs nearly unfettered and indefinite control via super-voting shares. The dangers were clearly spelled out in Facebook’s 2012 initial public offering prospectus and subsequent financial filings.

Though Zuckerberg’s majority voting power is extreme such cosy arrangements became widespread during the free-money era, especially in tech, as startup investors and stock exchanges vied to appear founder-friendly or risk being shut out of the next big thing.

×
The Edge Singapore
Download The Edge Singapore App
Google playApple store play
Keep updated
Follow our social media
© 2026 The Edge Publishing Pte Ltd. All rights reserved.