We live in a world assailed by crisis, with war, disease, and economic hardship taking a terrible toll on human welfare in recent years. Most alarming is the worsening impact of climate change, which threatens the existence of countless species, including our own.
Time is running out to fix the problem. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change recently warned that the planet’s temperature would likely rise 1.5° Celsius above pre-industrial levels within the next decade and will shoot past that critical threshold without immediate and massive emissions reductions. We could be entering a doom loop in which the consequences of climate change distract attention and divert resources from tackling its causes, further impeding progress as the effects worsen.
Billions of dollars are being invested in avoiding this fate, but trillions are needed. Where will it come from? High public debt levels constrain many countries’ policy options, and there aren’t enough bankable projects to generate the necessary private investment.
Multilateral development banks (MDBs) like the Asian Development Bank (ADB), of which I am president, can deliver critically needed financing and expertise for climate progress. But we can only take bold action if we make sweeping changes to our operations.
I believe that MDBs must do more and faster with the substantial resources that we manage. Simply placing climate action at the top of the development agenda is insufficient. The climate crisis demands a dramatic shift in our mindset as development professionals.
The stakes are highest in Asia and the Pacific. In addition to accounting for more than half of the world’s greenhouse-gas emissions, the region is warming faster than anywhere else and is acutely vulnerable to rising sea levels, extreme weather events, and biodiversity loss. These trends will only escalate if MDBs continue to pursue business as usual.
See also: Sembcorp and NYSE-listed Bloom Energy to bring low-carbon solutions to Singapore
To improve the odds that humanity wins the battle against climate change, MDBs must change in three ways. For starters, some basic principles of their operations, namely the traditional country-focused approach, must be recast. The costs of climate change and the benefits of adaptation and mitigation investments extend beyond national borders, so we need a more regional and global perspective that leverages MDBs’ unique convening and coordinating power across political jurisdictions. Initiatives such as the Energy Transition Mechanism, a collaborative and scalable blended-finance instrument to accelerate the retirement of coal power plants across our region, are a step in the right direction. Led by ADB, it combines concessional resources from donors, philanthropic sources, and others with market-priced funds from development-finance institutions and commercial investors.
Negative environmental effects
But much more is needed. Greening trade policies and agreements can reduce the negative environmental effects of trade, including the export of waste and plastics to developing countries. Likewise, more accurate pricing of manufacturing emissions in trade agreements can help prevent “brown” industries from relocating to poorer countries with weaker environmental regulations. Greater coordination on cross-border carbon-pricing mechanisms will also be necessary to encourage greener manufacturing and energy production.
See also: Unlocking opportunities in Asean while managing governance and compliance risks
The second change MDBs must embrace is to scale up climate investment significantly. The G20’s members have argued that MDBs could increase lending by hundreds of billions of dollars by implementing reforms to manage capital more effectively without jeopardising their triple-A credit rating.
I agree that we need to do more with what we have. The ADB is reviewing its capital-adequacy framework to explore how adjustments such as redefining risk tolerance and optimising balance sheets can create more headroom for increased lending. This is an important step, but more innovation is needed to generate additional resources and ensure that they incentivise bold climate action.
MDBs must expand their capacity to mobilise private investment for a broader range of climate programmes, including through blended-finance mechanisms. They should lead a global expansion of innovative financing structures, spurring more cross-border and public-private collaboration on climate action.
Another way to free up additional capital for climate-related investments is to share financial risk, which could be conditional guarantees from donor countries. Instead, capital that MDBs would set aside for default risk could be leveraged to generate additional resources.
MDBs should also use concessional finance, including grants, to improve project bankability. This is especially important for middle-income countries, which produce significant emissions but typically cannot access soft loans for development projects.
Finally, our institutions must become more efficient and effective. Embedding global and regional development priorities at the core of our business model requires stronger climate and sectoral expertise that can be mobilised across borders.
Private-sector and public-sector experts, whose work rarely overlaps at most MDBs, must collaborate to identify impediments to private investment in areas like renewable energy and design policies that could unlock downstream investment.
Sink your teeth into in-depth insights from our contributors, and dive into financial and economic trends
ADB’s new operating model will radically change our structure to reduce organisational silos and increase climate-related and private-sector work. I see this as only the first step on a path of reform that all MDBs must take to respond effectively to rapidly evolving challenges like global warming.
The sheer scale of climate change can make us feel helpless. But if we act boldly now, we can avoid the doom loop. I believe MDBs can rise to the challenge, as they have done in response to other global crises. Averting a catastrophe of this magnitude demands nothing less.
Masatsugu Asakawa is President of the Asian Development Bank
